Cannabis and Adolescent Brain Development
Bertha Madras, PhD (The Honorable)
Register Now - On-demand
Cannabis (marijuana) use is increasing, with growing commercialization facilitating new trends in cannabis consumption - more daily use and use of higher potency forms of the drug (high % THC or 9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the key psychoactive cannabinoid in cannabis). Acutely, cannabis produces euphoria, relaxation, reduces stress, but it can also impair cognitive function, coordination and engender anxiety and psychosis. With ongoing use, these adverse effects may be compounded by the development of cannabis use disorder (CUD) and other neuropsychiatric symptoms or disorders. The magnitude of adverse consequences and their persistence are associated with dose, use frequency, duration, and age of onset of use. Compared with adult onset, credible evidence has revealed that adolescent-onset and ongoing cannabis use confers a heightened risk of developing addiction, psychosis, cognitive impairment, depression, anxiety, suicidality, with some effects emerging during adulthood. Adolescent vulnerability during this critical phase of adolescent neurodevelopment is foreseeable, as the endogenous endocannabinoid signaling system continues to evolve and contribute to shaping brain architecture. In competing with endocannabinoid agonists at the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CBR1), THC interposes in these exquisitely controlled processes to dysregulate endocannabinoid signaling, triggering incompletely understood neuroadaptive changes. Recent trends of daily use and/or consumption of high potency cannabis products conceivably amplify the overall risks for adolescents, and also in the developing fetal brain. This presentation will describe:
Recent trends in cannabis use among youth, new and more potent forms of cannabis, and delivery systems, cannabis risks for the developing fetal and adolescent brain and how this information can be used.
CME: This webinar has been approved for a maximum 1, AOA Category 1-A CME credits. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of the extent of their participation.
This webinar is free to AOAAM members. Non-members - $35.
BAD MEDICINE: Mental Health and What the Opioid Epidemic Can Teach Us About Cannabis
James H. Berry, DO
Register Now - On-Demand
Over the past two decades, the number of people using cannabis has skyrocketed, along with individual and public health harms such as addiction, psychosis, and suicide. Concerning parallels exist between today's industry driven cannabis market and the prescription opioid pain pill industry which fueled our nation's addiction epidemic. This talk will review the current evidence regarding potential harms, equip participants to consider what products should be labeled a "medicine" and to reasonably discuss risks with patients, peers, media and legislators.
At the conclusion of this seminar, attendees will be able to:
Public Health Implications of Expanded Marijuana Programs Kenneth Finn, MD
Many states have expanded their marijuana programs for a variety of reasons, for both medical and recreational purposes. Over time our drug crisis has worsened under the banner of legalization despite one platform to legalize is curbing our crisis. Other health impacts have worsened during this time, including increased use during pregnancy with known harms of in utero exposure, increased health care utilization, addiction across many age groups, increased potency with known harms including suicide and psychosis. Other impacts to the brain and other organs are documented as well.
NIH - National Institute on Drug AbuseNew guides available to help communities respond to the opioid overdose crisis
SAMHSA, in collaboration with RTI International, has released two important resources intended to aid community practitioners in the ongoing work to end the overdose crisis. These products will equip public health practitioners, coalitions, nonprofits, and other groups working to prevent opioid-related deaths in their local communities with knowledge and best practices. With support from NIH, SAMHSA commissioned RTI International to develop the guides in collaboration with a technical expert panel. The guides are based on insights and tools from the ongoing National Institutes of Health (NIH) HEALing Communities Study. The HEALing Communities Study was launched in 2019 by the NIH and SAMHSA. The multi-site implementation research study is designed to test the impact of an integrated set of evidence-based practices across healthcare, behavioral health, justice, and other community-based settings. The study aims to prevent and treat opioid use disorder and reduce opioid-related overdose deaths in 67 communities across four states: Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York, and Ohio.
Opioid-Overdose Reduction Continuum of Care Approach (ORCCA) Practice Guide 2023
Engaging Community Coalitions to Decrease Opioid Overdose Deaths Practice Guide 2023
About the author: Adam D. Scioli, D.O., DFAPA, FASAM, FAOAAM is the Medical Director and Head of Psychiatry at Caron Treatment Centers.
For 30 years, we’ve been chasing a panacea for mental health, trying to find the right prescription or the right mix of medications as a substitute for comprehensive treatment. More and more, doctors prescribe medication alone, even though such medications should be supported by counseling.
The lack of qualified therapists is compounded by insurance companies making it even more difficult. It’s perceived that the pharmaceutical approach is less costly and more efficient. It’s easier to measure costs than quality.
We keep seeking the magic pill for behavioral and mental health — and there is no magic pill. The focus has swung too far towards stabilizing patients rather than getting them well. Getting well – having a good quality of life, being engaged in the community, maintaining strong relationships and, above all, finding meaning and purpose – requires time and effort.
Still, we keep looking for that labor-saving device. It’s not working. It’s getting worse. People are unhoused, living on the fringes, and dying of what have become known as the diseases of despair.
Here’s why we need to take a more comprehensive approach to behavioral health.
Despite epidemic levels of psychological distress left in the wake of the pandemic, our mental health system has never been more difficult to access.
While it’s now law that health care insurance provides coverage for mental health care on par with more traditional medical health care, that’s not a reality for most people. They find their insurance plans only have a few behavioral health care providers in-network, so many people seeking care end up paying the full cost themselves or delay getting help.
Small wonder many people don’t seek counseling. Even for those willing to pay out of pocket, there are months-long waiting lists for an appointment. There are simply not enough psychiatrists, psychologists and other qualified mental healthcare workers to meet the demand.
There is a disconnect among medical professionals in general, who often fail to consider behavioral health when working with patients.
Outside of those of us who work in the fields of mental health and addiction medicine, there are not enough providers who fully understand the implications of mental health, substance use disorder (SUD) or the combination of the two.
In my own work in SUD, I often see a lack of comfort among other specialties in caring for people with this disease. If the wrong drugs are used for anesthesia, for example, something as simple as a colonoscopy can risk reactivating someone in recovery. However, few anesthesiologists are trained to consider this as a factor in their preoperative evaluations.
This is a blind spot that can be easily rectified with a consult.
Compare this to the care we provide for an emergent disease like cancer. There’s an intensive period of evaluation and treatment for cancer, and then patients start on a treatment protocol that, in most cases, lasts several years, with surveillance for up to five years afterwards before a person is considered “cured.”
When we look at behavioral health care, instead of that comprehensive, intensive approach, we first jump to the least expensive and lowest level of care. Complete patient assessments and diagnostic testing are often limited and based solely on patient-reported symptoms without fully understanding the underlying pathology. This can lead to an incomplete or misdiagnosis, complicating further treatment. Only when someone “fails” that treatment do they graduate to more intensive care. Perhaps it’s the level of care that is failing the patients, not the patients who are failing.
There are no quick fixes.
Substance use and mental health disorders are closely linked. Of the estimated 20 million adults in the U.S. with SUD, almost 40% also suffer from some form of co-occurring mental illness. The reverse relationship is also true, with nearly 20% of adults with a mental illness also having a co-occurring SUD.........
Read more
Managing Difficult Encounters
R. Gregory R. Lande, DO, COL (Ret.), FACN, FAOAAM
Abstract:
Difficult doctor-patient relationships are a recognized aspect of modern healthcare, but the actual incidence, risk factors, ethical issues, and management strategies are less well-known. The author queried PubMed, ScienceDirect, and the Education Resources Information Center. The inclusion criteria consisted of the free-text terms “difficult patient” and “difficult client” and the Medical Subject Heading terms “patient participation” and “professional-patient relations” with searches further refined by focusing on adults, management, screening, and incidence among review and research articles published in academic journals in English. The author excluded articles focused on children, adolescents, and anger management. This study condenses a body of research spanning two decades and can help clinicians understand factors that contribute to difficult encounters, employ simple screening instruments, and implement management approaches that can minimize difficult encounters and maximize their successful resolutions. Based on the collected evidence, most doctor-patient relationships are trouble-free, but some, ranging between 10% and 20%, are dominated by difficulties of varying degrees and types.
Read the article.
The Drug Enforcement Agency, jointly with the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), is issuing a temporary rule to extend certain exceptions granted to existing DEA regulations in March 2020 as a result of the COVID19 Public Health Emergency (COVID-19 PHE), in order to avoid lapses in care for patients.
The full set of telemedicine flexibilities regarding prescription of controlled medications as were in place during the COVID-19 PHE will remain in place through November 11, 2023.
If a patient and a practitioner have established a telemedicine relationship on or before November 11, 2023, the same telemedicine flexibilities that have governed the relationship to that point are permitted until November 11, 2024.
According to the rule, ultimately, there will be a final set of regulations permitting the practice of telemedicine under circumstances that are consistent with public health, safety, and effective controls against diversion.
Read SAMHSA's release here.
March 29, 2023
Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Narcan, 4 milligram (mg) naloxone hydrochloride nasal spray for over-the-counter (OTC), nonprescription, use – the first naloxone product approved for use without a prescription. Naloxone is a medication that rapidly reverses the effects of opioid overdose and is the standard treatment for opioid overdose. Today’s action paves the way for the life-saving medication to reverse an opioid overdose to be sold directly to consumers in places like drug stores, convenience stores, grocery stores and gas stations, as well as online.
The timeline for availability and price of this OTC product is determined by the manufacturer. The FDA will work with all stakeholders to help facilitate the continued availability of naloxone nasal spray products during the time needed to implement the Narcan switch from prescription to OTC status, which may take months. Other formulations and dosages of naloxone will remain available by prescription only.
Drug overdose persists as a major public health issue in the United States, with more than 101,750 reported fatal overdoses occurring in the 12-month period ending in October 2022, primarily driven by synthetic opioids like illicit fentanyl.
“The FDA remains committed to addressing the evolving complexities of the overdose crisis. As part of this work, the agency has used its regulatory authority to facilitate greater access to naloxone by encouraging the development of and approving an over-the-counter naloxone product to address the dire public health need,” said FDA Commissioner Robert M. Califf, M.D. “Today’s approval of OTC naloxone nasal spray will help improve access to naloxone, increase the number of locations where it’s available and help reduce opioid overdose deaths throughout the country. We encourage the manufacturer to make accessibility to the product a priority by making it available as soon as possible and at an affordable price.”
Narcan nasal spray was first approved by the FDA in 2015 as a prescription drug. In accordance with a process to change the status of a drug from prescription to nonprescription, the manufacturer provided data demonstrating that the drug is safe and effective for use as directed in its proposed labeling. The manufacturer also showed that consumers can understand how to use the drug safely and effectively without the supervision of a healthcare professional. The application to approve Narcan nasal spray for OTC use was granted priority review status and was the subject of an advisory committee meeting in February 2023, where committee members voted unanimously to recommend it be approved for marketing without a prescription.
The approval of OTC Narcan nasal spray will require a change in the labeling for the currently approved 4 mg generic naloxone nasal spray products that rely on Narcan as their reference listed drug product. Manufacturers of these products will be required to submit a supplement to their applications to effectively switch their products to OTC status. The approval may also affect the status of other brand-name naloxone nasal spray products of 4 mg or less, but determinations will be made on a case-by-case basis and the FDA may contact other firms as needed.
The use of Narcan nasal spray in individuals who are opioid dependent may result in severe opioid withdrawal characterized by body aches, diarrhea, increased heart rate (tachycardia), fever, runny nose, sneezing, goose bumps, sweating, yawning, nausea or vomiting, nervousness, restlessness or irritability, shivering or trembling, abdominal cramps, weakness and increased blood pressure.
“Naloxone is a critical tool in addressing opioid overdoses and today’s approval underscores the extensive efforts the agency has undertaken to combat the overdose crisis,” said Patrizia Cavazzoni, M.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. “The FDA is working with our federal partners to help ensure continued access to all forms of naloxone during the transition of this product from prescription status to nonprescription/OTC status. Further, we will work with any sponsor seeking to market a nonprescription naloxone product, including through an Rx to OTC switch, and encourage manufacturers to contact the agency as early as possible to initiate discussions.”
The FDA has taken a series of measures to help facilitate access to naloxone products. In November 2022, the agency announced its preliminary assessment that certain naloxone products, such as the one ultimately approved today, have the potential to be safe and effective for over-the-counter use and encouraged sponsors to submit applications for approval of OTC naloxone products. The agency previously announced in 2019 that it had designed, tested, and validated a model naloxone Drug Facts Label (DFL) with easy-to-understand pictograms on how to use the drug to encourage manufacturers to pursue approval of OTC naloxone products. The model DFL was used to support the approved application along with the results of a simulated use Human Factors validation study designed to assess whether all the components of the product with which a user would interact could be used safely and effectively as intended.
Through the FDA Overdose Prevention Framework, the agency remains focused on responding to all facets of substance use, misuse, substance use disorders, overdose and death in the U.S. The framework’s priorities include: supporting primary prevention by eliminating unnecessary initial prescription drug exposure and inappropriate prolonged prescribing; encouraging harm reduction through innovation and education; advancing development of evidence-based treatments for substance use disorders; and protecting the public from unapproved, diverted or counterfeit drugs presenting overdose risks. The FDA granted the OTC approval of Narcan to Emergent BioSolutions.
Professional Affairs and Stakeholder Engagement Staff | Office of Center DirectorCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research |Food and Drug Administration10903 New Hampshire Ave
The American Osteopathic Academy of Addiction Medicine is a strategic partner of Addiction Treatment Professionals Rally for Solutions at ASAM’s 2023 Addiction Medicine Advocacy Conference.
https://www.asam.org/news/detail/2023/03/06/addiction-treatment-professionals-rally-for-solutions-at-2023-addiction-medicine-advocacy-conference
https://www.dea.gov/press-releases/2023/02/24/dea-announces-proposed-rules-permanent-telemedicine-flexibilities
WASHINGTON - Today, the Drug Enforcement Administration announced proposed permanent rules for the prescribing of controlled medications via telemedicine, expanding patient access to critical therapies beyond the scheduled end of the COVID-19 public health emergency. The public will be able to comment for 30 days on the proposed rules.
The proposed rules – developed with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and in close coordination with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs – propose to extend many of the flexibilities adopted during the public health emergency with appropriate safeguards.
The proposed rules do not affect:
The proposed rules also would not affect:
The proposed rules would provide safeguards for a narrow subset of telemedicine consultations—those telemedicine consultations by a medical practitioner that has: never conducted an in-person evaluation of a patient; AND that result in the prescribing of a controlled medication. For these types of consultations, the proposed telemedicine rules would allow medical practitioners to prescribe:
without an in-person evaluation or referral from a medical practitioner that has conducted an in-person evaluation, as long as the prescription is otherwise consistent with any applicable Federal and State laws. The proposed rules are explained in further detail for patients and medical practitioners on DEA.gov.
“DEA is committed to ensuring that all Americans can access needed medications,” said DEA Administrator Anne Milgram. “The permanent expansion of telemedicine flexibilities would continue greater access to care for patients across the country, while ensuring the safety of patients. DEA is committed to the expansion of telemedicine with guardrails that prevent the online overprescribing of controlled medications that can cause harm.”
“Improved access to mental health and substance use disorder services through expanded telemedicine flexibilities will save lives,” said HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra. “We still have millions of Americans, particularly those living in rural communities, who face difficulties accessing a doctor or health care provider in-person. At HHS, we are committed to working with our federal partners and stakeholders to advance proven technologies and lifesaving care for the benefit of all Americans.”
The proposed telemedicine rules also further DEA’s goal of expanding access to medication for opioid use disorder to anyone in the country who needs it. “Medication for opioid use disorder helps those who are fighting to overcome substance use disorder by helping people achieve and sustain recovery, and also prevent drug poisonings,” said DEA Administrator Milgram. “The telemedicine regulations would continue to expand access to buprenorphine for patients with opioid use disorder.”
The full text of the proposals may be found here and here. The public has 30 days to review and comment on the proposals, which DEA will then consider before drafting final regulations. DEA is appreciative of the public’s feedback.
For more information on DEA’s continued efforts to expand access to medications used in treatment for those suffering from opioid use disorder, visit: DEA’s Commitment to Expanding Access to Medication-Assisted Treatment.
Additional resources for patients can be found here:
Additional resources for practitioners can be found here:
###
AOAAM Online CME
Non-members interested in CME must create a profile with AOAAM. Subscribe now or Join Us to receive the full benefits of membership.
The 8-hour MOUD Training
Mission Statement
The mission of the American Osteopathic Academy of Addiction Medicine is to improve the health of individuals and families burdened with the disease of addiction.
PAY DUES ONLINE
SEARCH FOR MEMBERS
CLINICAL TOOLS